North Carolina v. Courtney
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear the case and did not decide whether double jeopardy bars a retrial in these circumstances.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 26, 2020
- What it’s about
- This case involves a dispute over whether the double jeopardy clause prevents the government from retrying a defendant after a mistrial if the government voluntarily dismisses the charge before the new trial begins.
- Who it affects
- The parties received no Supreme Court decision on whether double jeopardy barred a retrial in these circumstances.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The petition sought Supreme Court review of a decision by the Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Question presented
Whether the double jeopardy clause prevents the government from retrying a defendant after a mistrial if the government voluntarily dismisses the charge before the new trial begins.
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Court has finished this docket action. The record identifies no further Supreme Court step.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.