Skip to main content

North Carolina v. Courtney

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court refused to hear the case and did not decide whether double jeopardy bars a retrial in these circumstances.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 26, 2020

What it’s about
This case involves a dispute over whether the double jeopardy clause prevents the government from retrying a defendant after a mistrial if the government voluntarily dismisses the charge before the new trial begins.
Who it affects
The parties received no Supreme Court decision on whether double jeopardy barred a retrial in these circumstances.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for North Carolina v. Courtney
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition sought Supreme Court review of a decision by the Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Question presented

Whether the double jeopardy clause prevents the government from retrying a defendant after a mistrial if the government voluntarily dismisses the charge before the new trial begins.

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Court has finished this docket action. The record identifies no further Supreme Court step.

Documents

3

Docket activity

26
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis