Skip to main content

Gonzales v. Davis

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court refused to hear Gonzales’s case, leaving the Fifth Circuit’s refusal to reopen it in place; it did not decide the underlying legal question.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · May 18, 2020

What it’s about
The Court denied review of Gonzales’s case, leaving in place the Fifth Circuit’s refusal to reopen his federal habeas case under Rule 60(b)(6).
Who it affects
The Fifth Circuit’s refusal to reopen Gonzales’s federal case remains in place; the Supreme Court did not decide whether the change in law justified reopening it.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Gonzales v. Davis
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition argued that the Fifth Circuit wrongly treated a change in Supreme Court law on intellectual disability as categorically insufficient to justify reopening the case.

The dispute concerned whether a change in Supreme Court law on intellectual disability could be a rare reason for a federal court to reopen a case under Rule 60(b)(6).

Question presented

1. Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision that Petitioner failed to make a prima facie showing of intellectual disability is contrary to, or involves an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States in Moore v. Texas, 137 S. Ct. 1039 (2017) (Moore I), and Moore v. Texas, 139 S. Ct. 666 (2019) (Moore II). 2. Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision that Petitioner failed to make a prima facie showing of intellectual disability is based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Fifth Circuit’s refusal to reopen Gonzales’s federal case remains in place. The Supreme Court has finished this docket action.

Documents

3

Docket activity

27
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis