Murphy v. Texas
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear Murphy's petition, so it did not decide the timing question in this case.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · June 1, 2020
- What it’s about
- This case considers the proper timing for evaluating a capital defendant's intellectual functioning. Specifically, it addresses whether this assessment must be based on the defendant's intellectual function at the time of the crime and trial.
- Who it affects
- The denial ended Murphy's Supreme Court review, but it did not decide how his intellectual functioning should be evaluated.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The dispute concerned the timing of an intellectual-function evaluation in a capital case.
Question presented
Whether the evaluation of a capital defendant's intellectual functioning must be based on the defendant's intellectual function at the time of the crime and trial.
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court's review is complete. The record identifies no further Supreme Court step or answer to the timing question.
Documents
Opinions
Key filings
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.