Skip to main content

Murphy v. Texas

Updated Sep 20, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court refused to hear Murphy's petition, so it did not decide the timing question in this case.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided · June 1, 2020

What it’s about
This case considers the proper timing for evaluating a capital defendant's intellectual functioning. Specifically, it addresses whether this assessment must be based on the defendant's intellectual function at the time of the crime and trial.
Who it affects
The denial ended Murphy's Supreme Court review, but it did not decide how his intellectual functioning should be evaluated.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Murphy v. Texas
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The dispute concerned the timing of an intellectual-function evaluation in a capital case.

Question presented

Whether the evaluation of a capital defendant's intellectual functioning must be based on the defendant's intellectual function at the time of the crime and trial.

What the Court decided

Holding

Petition DENIED.

What's next

The Supreme Court's review is complete. The record identifies no further Supreme Court step or answer to the timing question.

Documents

2

Docket activity

25
  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 20, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 20, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Show 7 more
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

Older entries are on the full docket.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 20, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis