Skip to main content

No. 19-7230October Term 2019Decided May 18, 2020

Docket 19-7230October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

In re Lopez

The Supreme Court closed this docket by declining review, leaving the lower-court result in place without settling the legal issues for the country.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released May 18, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedMay 18, 2020
What it's about

This case involves a petition filed with the Supreme Court by a party named Lopez. The specific details and legal issues of the petition are not available in the provided record.

Question presented

1. Whether the rule announced in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. 2. Whether a petitioner is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus when he is incarcerated for conduct that the law does not make criminal.

Case path

Decision released May 18, 2020

Area

Criminal Procedure

Briefing

What it's about

Lopez asked the Supreme Court to take up questions about whether Rehaif applies retroactively on collateral review and whether habeas corpus relief is available when someone is jailed for conduct the law does not make criminal. On May 18, 2020, the Court declined review and did not decide those questions on the merits.

Impact

That means the Supreme Court did not resolve whether prisoners can use Rehaif to challenge older convictions through later appeals. For example, a person already serving time on a federal gun conviction did not get a nationwide answer from this case.

What's next

There is no further action in this Supreme Court docket. Any remaining steps would have to come in lower courts or through some other legal avenue, not from a Supreme Court merits decision in this case.

What was Lopez asking the Supreme Court to decide?

Lopez asked whether Rehaif applies retroactively in collateral review and whether habeas corpus can free someone jailed for non-criminal conduct.

What are the real-world consequences of the Court's action here?

The Court's refusal to hear the case means no nationwide answer came from this docket. Prisoners raising similar claims must keep fighting under existing lower-court rules.

What happens next after the Supreme Court's action in In re Lopez?

This Supreme Court case is over. The lower-court outcome stays in place unless Lopez has some other available path outside this docket.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court closed this docket by declining review, leaving the lower-court result in place without settling the legal issues for the country.

Impact

That means the Supreme Court did not resolve whether prisoners can use Rehaif to challenge older convictions through later appeals. For example, a person already serving time on a federal gun conviction did not get a nationwide answer from this case.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Jun 2, 2026
Primary materials7
Context reporting2