Skip to main content

No. 19-7058October Term 2019Decided Apr 27, 2020

Docket 19-7058October Term 2019 (2019–2020)

In re Randall

The Court closed the case without answering Randall's two questions on the merits.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Apr 27, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedApr 27, 2020
What it's about

This case involves a petition filed with the Supreme Court by a party named Randall. The specific legal issues and facts of the case are not detailed in the available records.

Question presented

1. Whether the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit have failed to exercise their jurisdiction by refusing to rule on Petitioner’s long-pending motions and appeals? 2. Whether a writ of mandamus should issue to compel the lower courts to decide the Petitioner’s cases?

Case path

Decision released Apr 27, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

Randall asked the Supreme Court to order the federal court in South Carolina and the Fourth Circuit to rule on motions and appeals he said had been pending too long. The Supreme Court declined to take up that request, so it did not decide whether the lower courts had wrongly failed to act.

Impact

That meant Randall did not get a Supreme Court order pushing the lower courts to act. For other people facing delays, it shows the justices did not use this case to step into a lower-court timing dispute.

What's next

This Supreme Court docket is over. Any further action would have to happen in the lower courts, if Randall still had related matters pending there.

What was Randall asking the Supreme Court to do in In re Randall?

He asked the justices to order the South Carolina federal court and the Fourth Circuit to rule on filings he said were delayed. He sought mandamus, an extraordinary order directing a court to act.

Did Randall get the Supreme Court order he wanted in In re Randall?

No. The justices did not step in, so Randall had no Supreme Court order forcing a faster lower-court decision. The lower courts stayed responsible for any remaining cases.

What happens next in In re Randall?

Nothing further is expected in this Supreme Court docket. Any next move would come in the lower courts, if related proceedings were still open.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court closed the case without answering Randall's two questions on the merits.

Impact

That meant Randall did not get a Supreme Court order pushing the lower courts to act. For other people facing delays, it shows the justices did not use this case to step into a lower-court timing dispute.

Not official Court text.

Timing

Decided April 27, 2020

The Court released its decision on April 27, 2020 without hearing oral argument.