Labat v. Vannoy

1. Whether the Fifth Circuit’s decision that Petitioner’s claim was procedurally defaulted is contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, in Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012) and Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. 413 (2013). 2. Whether the Fifth Circuit’s decision that Petitioner’s claim was procedurally defaulted is contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States, in Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266 (2012).