Skip to main content

Tribal police search powers

United States v. Cooley

Updated Oct 22, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court said tribal police may briefly detain and search people who are not Native American on public roads through reservations for possible state or federal violations; it wiped out the Ninth Circuit's ruling (vacated) and sent the case back (remanded).

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · June 1, 2021 · Opinion by Justice Breyer

What it’s about
The Court ruled that tribal police may briefly detain and search non-Indians on public roads through a reservation when state or federal law may have been violated.
Who it affects
The decision confirms that tribal police may briefly detain and search people who are not Native American on public roads through a reservation when state or federal law may have been violated.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for United States v. Cooley
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

It wiped out the Ninth Circuit’s ruling and sent the case back to the lower court (vacated and remanded).

The case shows how tribal police authority and state and federal law enforcement overlap on public roads crossing reservations.

Question presented

Whether the lower courts erred in suppressing evidence on the theory that a police officer of an Indian tribe lacked authority to temporarily detain and search respondent, a non-Indian, on a public right-of-way within a reservation based on a potential violation of state or federal law.

What the Court decided

Holding

A tribal police officer has authority to detain temporarily and to search non-Indian persons traveling on public rights-of-way running through a reservation for potential violations of state or federal law. 919 F. 3d 1135, vacated and remanded.

Result
Vacated

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyerwrote the opinion
  2. Roberts
  3. Thomas
  4. Alitoalso wrote separately
  5. Sotomayor
  6. Kagan
  7. Gorsuch
  8. Kavanaugh
  9. Barrett
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The Supreme Court's action is finished. The case returns to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings (remanded), with its earlier judgment wiped out (vacated).

Why it matters

It wipes out the Ninth Circuit's contrary ruling (vacated) and sends the case back for further proceedings (remanded).

Documents

3

Docket activity

12
  • New analysis added

    Oct 22, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 22, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 22, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 7 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

  • New analysis added

    Sep 3, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: status, opinion_date

    Jul 25, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Jun 1, 2021 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jun 19, 2020 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

5
What did the Supreme Court decide in United States v. Cooley?
It ruled that tribal police may briefly detain and search non-Indian travelers on public roads through a reservation for possible state or federal violations.
Why does the Cooley ruling matter?
It clarifies tribal police authority on public roads through reservations and removes the Ninth Circuit's contrary ruling.
What happened to the Ninth Circuit's ruling?
The Supreme Court wiped it out (vacated) and sent the case back to the lower court (remanded).
What happens next in United States v. Cooley?
The case returns to the Ninth Circuit for further proceedings (remanded), with its earlier judgment wiped out (vacated).
How did the justices vote in Cooley?
The Court ruled unanimously. Justice Breyer wrote the opinion, and Justice Alito signed on to it while also writing a separate opinion about the ruling's limits.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis