Skip to main content

Google v. Oracle America

Updated Sep 19, 2026

In brief

Google won on fair use: the Supreme Court overturned the Federal Circuit's ruling and sent the case back to that court (reversed and remanded).

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 6-2 · April 5, 2021 · Opinion by Justice Breyer

What it’s about
This case involves a copyright dispute over Google's use of Oracle's Java programming code. The Supreme Court ruled that Google's limited copying of the Java API constituted a fair use under copyright law.
Who it affects
Google won the fair-use question in this case. The Court's decision leaves open whether the copied Java lines themselves are protected by copyright.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The case tested how copyright law applies when programmers reuse software-interface code to build a new program.

Question presented

Whether the copied lines are copyrightable.

What the Court decided

Holding

Google’s copying of the Java SE API, which included only those lines of code that were needed to allow programmers to put their accrued talents to work in a new and transformative program, was a fair use of that material as a matter of law. 886 F. 3d 1179, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyerwrote the opinion
  2. Kagan
  3. Kavanaugh
  4. Sotomayor
  5. Roberts
  6. Gorsuch
Dissenting · 2disagreed with the result
  1. Thomaswrote the dissent
  2. Alito
6 justices joined the judgment, 2 dissented.

From the opinions

“Despite this, the majority holds that this copying was fair use.”

— Justice Thomas(dissent)

What's next

The case returns to the Federal Circuit after the Supreme Court sent it back (remanded it). The Supreme Court's fair-use decision leaves open whether the copied lines themselves are protected by copyright.

Documents

4

Docket activity

11
  • New analysis added

    Sep 19, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 19, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 6 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Status changed from pending to decided

    Mar 8, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Apr 5, 2021 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jan 24, 2019 · Court records

  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Oct 19, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

4
What did Google v. Oracle decide?
The Supreme Court ruled that Google's copying of the Java software interface was fair use under copyright law.
Why did the Court treat Google's copying as fair use?
The Court said the copying included only lines needed to help programmers apply existing skills in a new, transformative program.
Did the Court decide whether the copied lines were protected by copyright?
No. The Court ruled on fair use but did not decide whether the copied lines were protected by copyright.
What happens next in the Google-Oracle case?
The Federal Circuit will handle the case after the Supreme Court overturned its ruling and sent the case back (reversed and remanded).

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis