Skip to main content

No. 18-9130October Term 2018Decided Apr 27, 2020Updated Sep 5, 2026

Docket 18-9130October Term 2018 (2018–2019)

Dick v. Oregon

Dick won a new review of his Oregon case under the Supreme Court's unanimous-jury rule.

Case status

Decided · April 27, 2020

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Apr 27, 2020
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedApr 27, 2020
What it's about

The Court vacated the Oregon Court of Appeals’ judgment against Shaun Dick and sent the case back for reconsideration in light of Ramos v. Louisiana. In Ramos, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires unanimous jury verdicts to convict a defendant of a serious crime, so Dick prevailed in seeking review of Oregon’s nonunanimous-verdict rule.

Question presented

Whether the Sixth Amendment’s right to a jury trial—as applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment—requires a unanimous verdict to convict a defendant of a serious offense?

Case path

Court of Appeals of Oregon / Decision released Apr 27, 2020

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

Dick won a new review of his Oregon case under the Supreme Court's unanimous-jury rule.

Result
Vacated

Impact

The action affects Dick because Oregon's appeals court must reconsider his case under the unanimous-jury rule. It also underscores the importance of unanimous verdicts for people convicted of serious crimes.

Not official Court text.

Briefing

What it's about

The Supreme Court vacated the Oregon Court of Appeals' judgment against Shaun Dick and sent the case back for reconsideration in light of Ramos v. Louisiana. Ramos said serious-crime convictions require unanimous jury verdicts.

Impact

The action affects Dick because Oregon's appeals court must reconsider his case under the unanimous-jury rule. It also underscores the importance of unanimous verdicts for people convicted of serious crimes.

What's next

The case returns to the Oregon Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Ramos v. Louisiana. The Supreme Court has finished its action in this docket.

What did the Supreme Court do in Dick v. Oregon?

The Court vacated the Oregon Court of Appeals' judgment and sent Dick's case back for reconsideration under Ramos v. Louisiana.

Who is affected by the unanimous-jury rule in this case?

Dick is directly affected because his case must be reconsidered. The rule concerns people convicted of serious crimes by nonunanimous state juries.

What happens next in Dick v. Oregon?

The Oregon Court of Appeals must reconsider Dick's case in light of Ramos. The Supreme Court has completed its docket action.

Timing

Decided April 27, 2020

The Court released its decision on April 27, 2020 without hearing oral argument.

Activity

Docket activity2
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 5, 2026 | Generated

  • Brief added: Petition

    Apr 30, 2019 | Court records

Grounding

Grounding
Primary materials plus reporting.
Note
Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
Checked
Sep 5, 2026
Primary materials6
Context reporting2