Nagi v. Louisiana
In brief
The Supreme Court wiped out the Louisiana judgment (vacated) and sent Nagi's case back to the lower court (remanded), without finally deciding the jury-verdict claim.
- Where it stands
- Case remanded
Remanded · April 27, 2020
- What it’s about
- The Supreme Court granted Nagi’s petition, vacated the Louisiana court’s judgment, and sent the case back for reconsideration in light of Ramos v. Louisiana.
- Who it affects
- The Court's order wiped out (vacated) the earlier judgment, but it did not finally decide Nagi's jury-verdict claim or whether Nagi properly raised it below. The Louisiana court must reconsider the case in light of Ramos, so the final result remains open.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
In Ramos, the Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires unanimous jury verdicts in state criminal trials, so Nagi prevailed in obtaining further review under that ruling.
Ramos addressed whether the Constitution requires unanimous jury verdicts in state criminal trials, the broader issue behind Nagi's case.
Question presented
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment fully incorporates the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a unanimous jury verdict.
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Ramos v. Louisiana , 590 U. S. ___ (2020). Justice Alito, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand: In this and in all other cases in which the Court grants, vacates, and remands in light of Ramos v. Louisiana , I concur in the judgment on the understanding that the Court is not deciding or expressing a view on whether the question was properly raised below but is instead leaving that question to be decided on remand. Justice Thomas would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.
- Result
- Remanded
What's next
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, will reconsider the case in light of Ramos. It will also decide whether Nagi properly raised the issue below; the final result remains open.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
New analysis added
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Show 2 moreShow fewer
Status changed from pending to decided
Brief added: Petition
More questions
- What did the Supreme Court do in Nagi v. Louisiana?
- The Court agreed to hear Nagi's request, wiped out the Louisiana judgment (vacated), and sent the case back (remanded) for reconsideration under Ramos.
- Did the Supreme Court decide whether Nagi's state jury had to reach a unanimous verdict?
- No. This order did not decide that legal question; the Louisiana court must reconsider it in light of Ramos.
- Was Nagi's issue properly raised below?
- The Supreme Court did not decide that. Justice Alito said the question should be left for the Louisiana court when the case returns.
- What happens next in Nagi's case?
- The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, will reconsider the case in light of Ramos. The final outcome remains open.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.