Jobe v. Barr
In brief
The Supreme Court refused to hear Jobe's case, so it did not decide whether the immigration rules applied to a lawfully admitted permanent resident under the stated conditions.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · May 4, 2020
- What it’s about
- This case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari regarding the immigration status of a lawfully admitted permanent resident. Specifically, it addresses whether such an individual can be rendered deportable or inadmissible under certain conditions.
- Who it affects
- For Jobe and the government, Supreme Court review ended without an answer to the immigration question.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The petition came from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and concerned Jobe's immigration status as a lawfully admitted permanent resident.
Question presented
Whether a lawfully admitted permanent resident can be rendered deportable or inadmissible under certain conditions.
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition DENIED.
What's next
The Supreme Court's docket action is finished; this record shows no further step in that Court.
Documents
Opinions
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Show 7 moreShow fewer
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
New analysis added
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.