Skip to main content

R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC

Updated Sep 18, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court agreed with the Sixth Circuit: Title VII bars firing an employee merely for being transgender.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 6-3 · June 15, 2020 · Opinion by Justice Gorsuch

What it’s about
Aimee Stephens was fired from her job as a funeral director after informing her employer that she intended to transition from male to female.
Who it affects
The decision means employers covered by Title VII cannot fire employees merely because they are transgender. Lower courts and agencies should apply that rule to later employment-discrimination claims.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. EEOC
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court decided that firing an employee for being transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on sex.

The case tested whether Title VII's sex-discrimination ban reaches transgender employees directly or through sex stereotyping, such as rules about how men and women should act.

Question presented

Whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).

What the Court decided

Holding

An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII. 964, reversed and remanded. No. 17–1623, 883 F. 3d 100, and No. 18–107, 884 F. 3d 560, affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 6joined the Court's opinion
  1. Gorsuchwrote the opinion
  2. Roberts
  3. Breyer
  4. Ginsburg
  5. Kagan
  6. Sotomayor
Dissenting · 3disagreed with the result
  1. Alitowrote a dissent
  2. Thomas
  3. Kavanaughwrote a dissent
6 justices joined the judgment, 3 dissented.

From the opinions

“There is only one word for what the Court has done today: legislation.”

— Justice Alito(dissent)

What's next

The Sixth Circuit's ruling remains in place. Employers, lower courts, and agencies should apply Title VII consistently with this decision in future employment-discrimination matters.

Documents

3

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 18, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Sep 18, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: status, opinion_date

    Sep 5, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: opinion

    Jun 15, 2020 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jul 20, 2018 · Court records

  • Brief added: Questions Presented

    Court records

More questions

3
What did Harris Funeral Homes decide about transgender employees?
The Court decided that firing someone merely for being transgender violates Title VII, the federal law banning sex discrimination at work.
How does the ruling affect employers and agencies?
Employers covered by Title VII cannot fire employees merely because they are transgender. Agencies should apply that rule to employment-discrimination claims.
What happens next after the decision?
The Sixth Circuit's ruling remains in place. Lower courts should apply the same Title VII rule in later employment cases.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 18, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis