No. 17-1542October Term 2018Decided Feb 19, 2019Updated Sep 3, 2026
McKee v. Cosby
The Court declined review, leaving the First Circuit's result in place without deciding the legal question.
Case status
Decided · February 19, 2019
Read the opinion (PDF)- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Feb 19, 2019
- What it's about
Kathrine Mae McKee sued William H. Cosby, Jr. for defamation after publicly accusing him of sexual misconduct. The case asks whether a victim who speaks out publicly about their abuse becomes a limited-purpose public figure who must prove actual malice to win a defamation lawsuit.
Question presented
Whether a victim of sexual misconduct who makes a public statement about the incident is a “limited-purpose public figure” under New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), and its progeny, such that she must prove “actual malice” in order to maintain a defamation action against her accuser.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit / Decision released Feb 19, 2019
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court declined review, leaving the First Circuit's result in place without deciding the legal question.
Impact
The lower-court result remains in place. People who publicly discuss alleged sexual misconduct and later sue for defamation may face a higher burden in some cases.
Not official Court text.
Opinion documents
Briefing
What it's about
The Supreme Court declined to review McKee's defamation case against Cosby and did not decide the merits. The case concerned whether a person who publicly describes sexual misconduct becomes a limited-purpose public figure who must prove actual malice.
Impact
The lower-court result remains in place. People who publicly discuss alleged sexual misconduct and later sue for defamation may face a higher burden in some cases.
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished its action on this docket. The First Circuit's result remains in effect.
What did the Supreme Court do in McKee v. Cosby?
The Court declined to hear the case. It did not decide whether McKee was a limited-purpose public figure.
Who is affected by McKee v. Cosby?
People who publicly describe alleged sexual misconduct and later bring defamation claims may be affected by the lower court's approach.
What happens next in McKee v. Cosby?
The Supreme Court's docket action is finished. The First Circuit's result remains in place.
Timing
Decided February 19, 2019
The Court released its decision on February 19, 2019 without hearing oral argument.
Documents
Opinions
Orders
Key filings
Briefs on file: 4View on supremecourt.gov
Activity
Docket activity4
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
Sep 3, 2026 | Generated
Opinion added: Opinion
Feb 19, 2019 | Court records
Brief added: Petition
Apr 19, 2018 | Court records
Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions
Mar 7, 2018 | Court records
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Sep 3, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 17-1542
docket | Jul 25, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Jul 25, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Jul 25, 2026
Opinion
opinion | Feb 19, 2019
Petition
brief | Apr 19, 2018
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Mar 7, 2018
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 3, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Sep 3, 2026