Skip to main content
Supreme Court Case TrackerThe Court, in plain English

Argument sitting

October 2026 oral arguments

6 cases across 5 argument daysArguments begin at 10 a.m. Eastern
Five argument days, October 5 to October 14, 2026. One of them has more than one case.

2 cases
Before ArgumentsClimate change liabilitySuncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.1. Whether federal law precludes state-law claims seeking relief for injuries allegedly caused by the effects of interstate and international greenhouse-gas emissions on the global climate. 2. Whether this Court has statutory and Article III jurisdiction to hear this case.Argument 25-170Before ArgumentsFloyd D. Johnson, Petitioner v. United States CongressDid the Veterans' Judicial Review Act strip district courts of the jurisdiction, recognized by this Court in Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361 (1974), to hear challenges to the constitutionality of acts of Congress affecting veterans' benefits?Argument 25-735

1 case
Before ArgumentsWinston R. Anderson, et al., Petitioners v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al.Whether, for claims predicated on fund underperformance, pleading that an ERISA fiduciary failed to use the requisite "care, skill, prudence, or diligence" under the circumstances and thus breached ERISA's duty of prudence when investing plan assets requires alleging a "meaningful benchmark"?Argument 25-498

1 case
Before ArgumentsDepartment of the Air Force, et al., Petitioners v. Prutehi Guahan, fka Prutehi Litekyan1. Whether the federal government's submission to a state or territorial regulator of an application to renew a RCRA permit is "final agency action" that is immediately reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 704. 2. Whether the federal government must comply with the general environmental-review procedures of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., before submitting a permit-renewal application under RCRA, which sets forth its own specific procedures to review environmental impacts in the context of hazardous-waste treatment.Argument 25-579

1 case
Before ArgumentsKendrick Jarrell Beaird v. United StatesWhether Stinson v. United States, 508 U. S. 36 (1993), still correctly states the rule for the deference that courts must give the commentary to the Sentencing Guidelines?Argument 25-5343

1 case
Before ArgumentsMichael Salazar, Petitioner v. Paramount Global, dba 247SportsDoes the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider,” as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act’s definition of “consumer,” refer to all of a video tape service provider’s goods or services or only to its audiovisual goods or services?Argument 25-459