Skip to main content
Docket 96-79
Docket 96-79

Boggs v. Boggs

```json {

Status
Decided
Decision released
Jun 2, 1997

Decision briefing

The case in plain English

Start with the holding, why it matters, and the strongest takeaways from the opinions.

What are the basics?

```json { "summary": "The Court considered whether federal pension law (ERISA) overrides state community property laws that would allow a deceased first wife to leave her interest in her husband's undistributed pension benefits to her sons in her will. The Court ruled that ERISA preempts such state laws to protect the economic security of the surviving spouse.", "questionPresented": "Does the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) pre-empt state community-property law allowing a non-participant spouse to transfer by a testamentary instrument an interest in undistributed pension plan benefits?" } ```

Where things stand

Timeline

Key court milestones at a glance.

Case Accepted
Arguments HeardUpcoming
Decision ReleasedJun 2, 1997

Source note

How this page is sourced

The short sourcing note for this page, without the extra clutter.

This page is grounded in official case materials and tracker data.

Page data last refreshed Mar 8, 2026.

Primary materials

Documents & resources

Briefs, opinions, transcripts, and audio when they are available.

Opinions

Boggs
opinionBy Kennedy, Breyer, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Ii-B-

Recent coverage

In the news

Selected reporting and analysis that can help you follow the public conversation around the case.

More to watch

Related cases on the docket

Other live cases with a similar posture, so readers can move across the docket without losing the thread.