Skip to main content
Docket 96-7185
Docket 96-7185

Bates v. United States

```json {

Status
Decided
Decision released
Nov 4, 1997

Decision briefing

The case in plain English

Start with the holding, why it matters, and the strongest takeaways from the opinions.

What's this case about?

Whether a district court that chooses to conduct a resentencing under Section 404 of the First Step Act is prohibited from considering a defendant's current, legally correct Sentencing Guidelines range.

What are the basics?

```json { "summary": "This case involved a technical school treasurer charged with knowingly and willfully misapplying federally insured student loan funds. The Supreme Court ruled that the relevant statute does not require the government to prove the defendant had a specific intent to injure or defraud the United States or another party.", "questionPresented": "Does 20 U.S.C. § 1097(a), which prohibits the knowing and willful misapplication of federally insured student loan funds, require the government to allege and prove that the defendant had a specific intent to injure or defraud the United States or another party?" } ```

Where things stand

Timeline

Key court milestones at a glance.

Case Accepted
Arguments HeardUpcoming
Decision ReleasedNov 4, 1997

Source note

How this page is sourced

The short sourcing note for this page, without the extra clutter.

This page is grounded in official case materials and tracker data.

Page data last refreshed Mar 8, 2026.

Primary materials

Documents & resources

Briefs, opinions, transcripts, and audio when they are available.

Opinions

Bates
opinionBy Ginsburg

Recent coverage

In the news

Selected reporting and analysis that can help you follow the public conversation around the case.

More to watch

Related cases on the docket

Other live cases with a similar posture, so readers can move across the docket without losing the thread.