Jury findings for repeat offenses
Anthony Lee Daniels v. United States
In brief
- Where it stands
- Dismissed
Petition denied.
- What it’s about
- Anthony Lee Daniels asked the Supreme Court to review what the government must prove to show that an acknowledged error in his case did not affect the outcome. The Court refused to hear the case (denied the petition), so it did not decide that question.
- Who it affects
- The denial ends Daniels’s request for Supreme Court review, but does not decide the government’s burden in his case.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The question asks how much the government must show to establish that an acknowledged legal error did not change the outcome.
Question presented
What showing must the Government make to carry its harmless-error burden on an acknowledged error under Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024)?
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 2 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Petition
Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.