Notice before trust judgments
Hesser v. Blea
In brief
- Where it stands
- Dismissed
Petition denied.
- What it’s about
- Army service member Addison Hesser, a named trust beneficiary, challenged a judgment against the trust entered without notice while he was serving abroad.
- Who it affects
- The Nevada Supreme Court's ruling remains in place in Hesser's case; the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to hear it did not endorse its reasoning.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
Nevada’s highest court said the trustee’s participation meant Hesser’s right to fair notice was not violated and that he had to show a defense to get relief; the Supreme Court refused to hear his case (denied review) and did not decide those issues.
Army service member Addison Hesser was abroad when the judgment against the trust was entered; he was a named beneficiary.
Nevada's highest court said the trustee's participation meant Hesser's right to fair notice was not violated, and that he had to show a defense to get relief from the judgment.
Question presented
1. Whether a known beneficiary of a trust, holding a present interest that state law expressly entitles him to protect through pre-judgment notice and intervention, is deprived of property without due process of law when a judgment is entered against the trust corpus without any notice to him, solely because the trustee participated in the litigation. 2. Whether, consistent with Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc., 485 U.S. 80 (1988), and Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545 (1965), a State may deny relief from such a judgment because the person who received no notice has not shown a meritorious defense to the underlying claims.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 1 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.