Skip to main content

Who counts as an employee

Goodwin v. AT&T

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Antonio Goodwin says AT&T records show he worked for an AT&T company and argues that lower-court judges denied him fair treatment under the Fifth Amendment by rejecting his motions and not penalizing alleged false statements by AT&T representatives.
Who it affects
Goodwin received no Supreme Court decision on his claims; the Court did not decide whether they were valid or endorse either side.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Antonio Goodwin, Petitioner v. AT&T Corporation
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

He asks the Supreme Court to review those issues.

Goodwin says AT&T records show he worked for an AT&T company. He also claims lower-court judges denied him fair treatment by rejecting his motions and not penalizing alleged false statements by AT&T representatives.

Goodwin's petition asked the Court to review a Ninth Circuit case and his claims that the lower-court proceedings violated the Fifth Amendment.

Question presented

1. Whether Antonio Goodwin was employed by AT&T, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Inc., AT&T Corp., or any AT&T-related entities/Companies? 2. WHY THE FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION WAS VIOLATED REGRADING THE MOTION TO RECALL THE MANDATE IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT FILED ON JUNE 9, 2026? 3. Why The Fifth Amendment due process Clause was violated where Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin filed a dispositive motion on September 10, 2025 that should have been granted in Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Goodwin’ s favor? 4. WHY THE FEDERAL FALSE-STATEMENT, PERJURY, AND DECLARATION-UNDER-PENALTY-OF-PERJURY WAS NOT IMPOSE AGAINST AT&T, PAMELA M. PHILLIPS AND STACEY CAMPBELL I & Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause Violated?

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Jun 26, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis