Court clerks and default judgments

1. Whether a District Court inflicts an ongoing structural and constitutional harm upon the Petitioner under Article Ill and the separation of powers doctrine by docketing Petitioner 's ministerial fillin g for a clerk-entered default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1) as a judicial motion, thereby assuming judicial authority over these submissions and stripping the petitioner of the mandatory substantive protection by the Rule. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals compounds this structural judicial governance breakdown by adjudicating Petitioner's appeal based on existing record — formally disputed, thereby adopting the District Court's characterization of a "motion" and proceeding on issues not presented by the Petitioner.