Court review of fraud claims

1. Where Respondents blatantly and consistently violate civil, criminal, moral, ethical and legally accepted precepts, corroborated by copious evidentiary proof, was the Florida Supreme Court remiss in refusing to review this case, forgoing the application of applicable laws that are there to hold Respondents accountable and protect citizenry? 2. Was the refusal of the courts to acknowledge the Respondents ’ proven pattern of conduct, committing fraud, coercion, retaliation, bribery, and perjury, in direct conflict with the evidence submitted, and the growing number of cases nationwide of Respondents lying under oath to obtain legal actions through illegal means, without ever having to provide actual proof of their allegations?