Keeping children in state care
Brandy Smith Funderburg v. Harrisonburg Rockingham County Department of Social Services
In brief
- Where it stands
- Dismissed
Petition denied.
- What it’s about
- Brandy Smith Funderburg asked the Supreme Court to review whether Virginia may use a “more likely than not” proof standard in child-dependency cases and whether unclear child-welfare laws violate constitutional due-process protections.
- Who it affects
- Funderburg did not get Supreme Court review, and the Court did not resolve her constitutional claims in this case.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Court refused to hear her case (denied review), so it did not decide those questions.
The case came to the U.S. Supreme Court from Virginia's highest court, the Supreme Court of Virginia.
Question presented
1. Is a preponderance of evidence standard sufficient for the State to confine children indefinitely? 2. Does indeterminacy in child welfare law violate Constitutional due process protections, and do overly-vague statutory definitions violate the vagueness and over-breadth doctrines of the Constitution?
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 1 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.