Skip to main content

Right to prison time credits

White v. Warden

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
William A. White argued that the First Step Act gives qualifying federal prisoners a protected interest in earning time credits, but the Fourth Circuit ruled that it does not.
Who it affects
The denial leaves the Fourth Circuit's decision in place for White, but gives no Supreme Court ruling on his claimed right.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for William A. White, Petitioner v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Cumberland
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court refused to hear White’s case (denied review) and did not decide whether the Fifth Amendment protects that interest.

White argued that the First Step Act gives qualifying federal prisoners a protected right to earn time credits. The Fourth Circuit rejected that position.

The case asked whether the First Step Act's time-credit program creates a right protected by the Fifth Amendment.

Question presented

Whether the First Step Act creates a legitimate right or expectation in earning time credits for qualifying federal prisoners that can give rise to a liberty interest protected by the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause?

Documents

2

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Aug 5, 2026 · Court records

  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Jul 6, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis