Skip to main content

Limits on cloud search warrants

Kimberley Ann Tew v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
The Supreme Court refused to hear Kimberley Ann Tew’s challenge to a warrant allowing officers to search an iCloud account for evidence tied to six criminal laws.
Who it affects
Tew did not receive a Supreme Court decision on her claim, and the Court did not endorse either side’s position.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Kimberley Ann Tew, Petitioner v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

Tew argued the warrant was so broad that officers could not rely on the rule that may protect evidence gathered when officers reasonably rely on a warrant; the Court did not decide that question.

The dispute concerns a rule that may protect evidence gathered when officers reasonably rely on a warrant.

Question presented

Whether a warrant authorizing officers to search an iCloud account for violations of six “extremely broad” criminal statutes (Pet. App. 31a)—including the federal conspiracy and wire-fraud statutes—is so facially overbroad as to preclude application of the Leon good faith exception.

Documents

2

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Jul 15, 2026 · Court records

  • Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions

    Jun 15, 2026 · Court records

More questions

1
What is the good-faith exception?
It may allow evidence to be used when officers reasonably rely on a warrant.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis