Gun rights after felony convictions
Taylor v. United States
In brief
- Where it stands
- Dismissed
Petition denied.
- What it’s about
- Mallory Taylor asked the Supreme Court to review whether federal firearm laws comply with the Second Amendment and permit convictions based on a firearm’s past movement across state lines.
- Who it affects
- The denial ended Taylor’s request for Supreme Court review but did not resolve the questions raised in his case.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Court refused to hear the case (denied the petition) and did not decide either question.
Taylor’s petition raised questions about federal firearm law, including whether it can cover a firearm that crossed state lines at any point in the past.
Question presented
1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment? 2. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional?
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 1 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.