Limits on court filings

1. Whether due process is violated when a judge whose neutrality was reasonably questioned failed to disqualify herself from Petitioner ’ s lower-court criminal/misdemeanor matter, continued to preside over or affect proceedings involving Petitioner ’ s liberty and appellate rights, and the resulting orders were used to dismiss appellate review and restrict Petitioner ’ s future access to the appellate court. 2. Whether a state appellate court violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments when it imposes a blanket order prohibiting an indigent self-represented litigant from filing further pro se petitions, appeals, motions, or other proceedings unless a licensed attorney reviews and signs the filing. 3. Whether due process permits a continuing pro se filing ban based on prior unsuccessful filings without an individualized finding of bad faith, an evidentiary hearing, consideration of lesser restrictions, or a preserved channel for criminal, liberty, emergency, jurisdictional, or constitutional claims. 4. Whether a state appellate court denies access to the courts when it dismisses an appeal arising from lower-court proceedings involving judicial disqualification, discovery disputes, sanctions, property deprivation, official misconduct, failure to perform criminal-procedure duties, judicial corruption, and claims of government abuse of power without meaningful review of the federal questions presented. 5. Whether a court may use unlawful tactics, procedural irregularities, or judicial misconduct to secure a conviction or appellate restriction where the litigant raised due-process, neutral-tribunal, and abuse-of-power objections.