Appeals court rehearing rules

1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit ’ three-judge panel final order and judgment denying Rehearing and En Banc Rehearing under FRAP 40 violates the regulatory authority for the Court ’ s Rehearing or En Banc Rehearing at Rule 40(b)(2)(A)-(D). 2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit ’ three-judge-panel final injunction against rehearing that contravenes FRAP 40 further contravenes the Court ’ s FRCP 56 and is unconstitutional for infringement on Congress ’ RICO Act pursuant Art. 1 sec. 8 cl. 3 of the Constitution. 3. Whether the Eleventh Circuit ’ three-judge panel final injunction against En Banc Rehearing or Rehearing conditioned on the request by a judge to vote for Rehearing I En Banc Rehearing contravenes FRAP 40 (c) clear reading for judges in regular active service poll taken as permissive not requisite for the rehearing order or, the question put differently, is 28 U.S.C. sec. 46 (c) in conflict with FRAP 40 (c) ’ textual reading.