Skip to main content

Jury rights for release violations

Coleman v. United States

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Maurice Coleman asked the Supreme Court to review whether 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) is consistent with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. The Court refused to hear the case (denied review), so it did not decide that constitutional question.
Who it affects
Coleman’s Supreme Court case ends without a decision on whether § 3583(g) complies with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Maurice Coleman, Petitioner v. United States
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The dispute raised a constitutional challenge to a federal statute.

Question presented

Does 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) comport with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments?

Documents

1

Docket activity

6
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 1 more
  • Brief added: Petition

    Jul 13, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis