Fair hearings over property
Singer v. Boekankamp
In brief
- Where it stands
- Dismissed
Petition denied.
- What it’s about
- Karina Singer asked the Supreme Court to review her claim that Nevada courts relied on conflicting records and made findings about property distribution without giving her a fair chance to respond.
- Who it affects
- Singer did not obtain Supreme Court review, and the Court did not decide her constitutional claims.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The Court refused to hear the case (denied the petition), so it did not decide whether those procedures violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
The dispute reached the Supreme Court from Nevada's Court of Appeals and concerned a state-court judgment about property distribution.
Question presented
1. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment permits a state appellate court to affirm a judgment depriving a litigant of property and impose procedural forfeitures based on materially conflicting official records, where the litigant timely requested settlement and correction of the record but no court determined which version accurately reflected what was filed, heard, or decided. 2. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment permits a state court to resolve disputed, outcome-determinative facts and order final distribution of property through findings first announced after an argument-only hearing, where no testimony was taken, the court muted the affected party during opposing counsel ’ s factual presentation, refused her request to rebut those assertions one by one with identified evidence, and entered final judgment without addressing her timely, evidence-supported objections to those findings.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 1 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.