Gun evidence and other crimes
William John Ewing v. United States
In brief
- Where it stands
- Dismissed
Petition denied.
- What it’s about
- William Ewing asked the Supreme Court to review his convictions, arguing that the trial court wrongly admitted evidence of an uncharged robbery alongside four charged robberies and that the evidence did not show he possessed a firearm under federal law.
- Who it affects
- The denial ends Ewing's request for Supreme Court review, but the Court did not decide whether either claim warranted relief.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.

What it's about
The Court refused to hear the case (denied review), so it did not decide those claims.
The case came to the Supreme Court from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Question presented
1. OTHER ACTS EVIDENCE CREATES A SIGNIFICANT RISK OF IMPROPER CONSIDERATIONS BY A JUROR OF A DEFENDANT’S CHARACTER INSTEAD OF THE EVIDENCE RELATED TO THE CHARGES. THE TRIAL COURT ALLOWED EVIDENCE OF A ROBBERY FOR WHICH MR. EWING WAS NOT CHARGED INTO EVIDENCE WITH FOUR OTHER ROBBERIES IN THE INDICTMENT. WHERE THE TRIAL COURT IMPROPERLY DETERMINED PROBATIVE VALUE AND FAILED TO EVALUATE UNFAIR PREJUDICE, IS MR. EWING ENTITLED TO A NEW TRIAL? 2. THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT REQUIRES THAT A CRIMINAL PROSECUTION BE SUPPORTED BY PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. WHERE NO RATIONAL JURY COULD CONCLUDE FROM THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED THAT MR. EWING POSSESED A FIREARM AS DEFINED IN LAW, MUST HIS CONVICTION FOR VIOLATING 18 U.S.C. §924(c) BE VACATED?
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 1 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Petition
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.