Skip to main content

Appeals of injunction denials

Campbell v. Rubio

Updated Nov 12, 2026

In brief

Where it stands
Dismissed

Petition denied.

What it’s about
Raymond Campbell’s petition asks whether the Fifth Circuit could throw out (dismiss) his appeal without applying a practical-effect test when a district court order effectively refused a temporary court order indefinitely.
Who it affects
The denial ends Campbell’s request for Supreme Court review but gives no Supreme Court answer on whether the Fifth Circuit properly dismissed his appeal.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Raymond Campbell, Petitioner v. Marco Rubio, Secretary of State, et al.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The petition focused on whether the effect of a district court’s order—not just its wording—could permit an immediate appeal.

Question presented

Whether a court of appeals may dismiss, for lack of appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), an appeal from a district court order whose practical effect is to refuse preliminary injunctive relief indefinitely, without applying the practical-effect standard of Carson and A.A.R.P.

Documents

1

Docket activity

7
  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 12, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

Show 2 more
  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Nov 12, 2026 · Court records

  • Brief added: Petition

    Sep 8, 2026 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 12, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis