Forced medical treatment
Boyd v. Shriners Hospitals for Children
In brief
- Where it stands
- Dismissed
Petition denied.
- What it’s about
- Former Shriners Hospitals for Children employees asked whether the Fourteenth Amendment bars a state or its agent from requiring someone, under threat of penalty, to take a drug or covered countermeasure, given federal consent rules and the PREP Act’s rule on lawsuits for resulting injuries.
- Who it affects
- The order ended this Supreme Court case but did not decide whether the challenged requirements violate the Fourteenth Amendment.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Supreme Court refused to hear the case (denied review), so it did not decide either question.
The questions linked state-required medical measures to federal rules on consent to certain drugs and lawsuits over injuries from covered countermeasures.
Question presented
1. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a State, or its delegated agent, from mandating that an individual accept the administration of a drug that is exempt from 21 U.S.C. § 355(a), under threat of penalty, where federal law conditions that exemption on consent obtained free of coercion, undue influence, and unjustifiable pressure. 2. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a State or its delegated agent from mandating that an individual accept the administration of a covered countermeasure, where the PREP Act’s immunity provision, 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(a)(1), extinguishes the recipient’s right to access the courts for a resulting injury.
Documents
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 2 moreShow fewer
Brief added: Petition
Court Order added: Lower Court Orders/Opinions
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.