Time limits on police claims

1. Did the 9th Circuit three judge panel err in its calculation of the statute of limitations for the torts presented based on legal theories including date of discovery rules, estoppel and other forms detrimental reliance generated by WSP Trooper Ed Collins, supervisor of Brady listed for perjury WSP Trooper Andrew Vanderwielen, the actual statute of limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law tort claims, continued sanctions of State of WA under Trueblood v. State of WA DSHS, and claims tolling based on false imprisonment and grave disability? 2. Did the 9th Circuit 3 judge panel err in its con clusion this case was suitable for decision without oral argument? 3. Did the 9th Circuit three judge panel err in its conclusion that negligence claims including medical malpractice against Emergency Doctor of Osteopathy Emergency Riddhi Kothari DO cannot be brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 including gross negligence, intentional negligence, intentional and clearly incom petent negligence?