Skip to main content
Docket 24-482October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Holsey Ellingburg, Jr., Petitioner v. United States

The Court unanimously reversed and remanded an Eighth Circuit decision.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Jan 20, 2026
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardOct 14, 2025
Decision ReleasedJan 20, 2026
What it's about

The Court unanimously reversed and remanded an Eighth Circuit decision. Justice Kavanaugh authored the 9-0 opinion addressing federal criminal law questions.

Question presented

Is criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit / Decision released Jan 20, 2026

Area

Criminal Procedure

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

This case asked whether restitution (money paid to victims) under the MVRA counts as criminal punishment. The Court unanimously ruled that MVRA restitution is criminal punishment for Ex Post Facto Clause purposes. It reversed the Eighth Circuit and sent the case back.

Result
Reversed

Impact

Federal defendants whose crimes happened before the MVRA may be most affected. The Court said MVRA restitution is criminal punishment under the Ex Post Facto Clause (constitutional rule against retroactive punishment). For example, Ellingburg committed his crime before 1996 but was later ordered to pay $7,567.25. Next, lower courts must apply that rule when similar federal restitution challenges arise.

Not official Court text.