Docket 24-421
Cynthia Davis, Warden, Petitioner v. David M. Smith
This case involves a challenge to a trial court's decision to admit witness identification evidence that was allegedly obtained through an unnecessary and impermissibly suggestive procedure.
- Status
- Decided
- Appeal from
- United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Decision released
- Jan 27, 2025
Decision briefing
The case in plain English
Structured case briefing unavailable
The generated briefing for this case is missing or invalid, so this page is not rendering a partial substitute. Use the timeline, sourcing note, and primary materials below instead.
Where things stand
Timeline
Case Accepted
Arguments HeardUpcoming
Decision ReleasedJan 27, 2025
Source note
How this page is sourced
This page is grounded in official case materials and tracker data.
Page data last refreshed Mar 9, 2026.
Primary materials
Documents & resources
Opinions
Briefs
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Main Document
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Petition
brief
Appendix
brief
Proof of Service
brief
Order
Recent coverage
In the news
More to watch
Related cases on the docket
Docket 25-312Cathy Harris, Petitioner v. Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.Docket 25-5Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Al Otro Lado, a California Corporation, et al.Docket 25-250Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al.Docket 25-457Topaz Johnson, et al., Petitioners v. High Desert State Prison, et al.