Skip to main content

No. 24-1180October Term 2025Decided Oct 14, 2025

Docket 24-1180October Term 2025 (2025–2026)

Corrine Morgan Thomas, et al., Petitioners v. Humboldt County, California, et al.

The Court did not use this case to settle whether the Seventh Amendment civil-jury right is incorporated against the states.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Oct 14, 2025
Case Accepted
Arguments
Decision ReleasedOct 14, 2025
What it's about

This is a procedural application submitted to Justice Kagan requesting an extension of time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari in a case originating from the Ninth Circuit.

Question presented

Whether the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial in suits at common law is incorporated against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Oct 14, 2025

Area

Decided Supreme Court case

Briefing

What it's about

This case asked whether the Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court ended this petition-stage matter without answering that question on the merits, leaving the Ninth Circuit result in place.

Impact

The issue matters to people in civil disputes with state or local governments who want a jury, not just a judge, to hear their case. For example, residents challenging county actions may care whether they can demand a jury trial in state-level litigation.

What's next

This Supreme Court docket action is over. The lower-court result remains in place, and the constitutional question would need to return in a future case for the Court to address it.

What was the main question in Thomas v. Humboldt County?

The petitioners asked whether the Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

Why does this case matter outside Humboldt County?

It matters to people suing state or local governments in civil cases. They may want a jury to decide facts instead of only a judge.

What is the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's action here?

There is no further step in this Supreme Court matter. The lower-court result stays in place unless a similar issue reaches the Court in another case.

Decision

Decision record

What the Court decided

The Court did not use this case to settle whether the Seventh Amendment civil-jury right is incorporated against the states.

Impact

The issue matters to people in civil disputes with state or local governments who want a jury, not just a judge, to hear their case. For example, residents challenging county actions may care whether they can demand a jury trial in state-level litigation.

Not official Court text.

Opinion documents

Timing

Decided October 14, 2025

The Court released its decision on October 14, 2025 without hearing oral argument.