No. 24-1180October Term 2025Decided Oct 14, 2025
Corrine Morgan Thomas, et al., Petitioners v. Humboldt County, California, et al.
The Court did not use this case to settle whether the Seventh Amendment civil-jury right is incorporated against the states.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Oct 14, 2025
- What it's about
This is a procedural application submitted to Justice Kagan requesting an extension of time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari in a case originating from the Ninth Circuit.
Question presented
Whether the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial in suits at common law is incorporated against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment.
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit / Decision released Oct 14, 2025
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Briefing
What it's about
This case asked whether the Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court ended this petition-stage matter without answering that question on the merits, leaving the Ninth Circuit result in place.
Impact
The issue matters to people in civil disputes with state or local governments who want a jury, not just a judge, to hear their case. For example, residents challenging county actions may care whether they can demand a jury trial in state-level litigation.
What's next
This Supreme Court docket action is over. The lower-court result remains in place, and the constitutional question would need to return in a future case for the Court to address it.
What was the main question in Thomas v. Humboldt County?
The petitioners asked whether the Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Why does this case matter outside Humboldt County?
It matters to people suing state or local governments in civil cases. They may want a jury to decide facts instead of only a judge.
What is the next procedural step after the Supreme Court's action here?
There is no further step in this Supreme Court matter. The lower-court result stays in place unless a similar issue reaches the Court in another case.
Decision
What the Court decided
The Court did not use this case to settle whether the Seventh Amendment civil-jury right is incorporated against the states.
Impact
The issue matters to people in civil disputes with state or local governments who want a jury, not just a judge, to hear their case. For example, residents challenging county actions may care whether they can demand a jury trial in state-level litigation.
Not official Court text.
Timing
Decided October 14, 2025
The Court released its decision on October 14, 2025 without hearing oral argument.
Documents
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary materials plus reporting.
- Note
- Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Jul 2, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials9
Supreme Court docket 24-1180
docket | May 1, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | May 1, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | May 1, 2026
Opinion
opinion | Oct 14, 2025
Thomas
opinion | Oct 14, 2025
Petition
brief | May 15, 2025
Lower Court Orders/Opinions
order | Jan 28, 2025
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026
SupremeCourt.gov
official | Jul 2, 2026