Cash benefits in hospital rates
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Kennedy
In brief
For this Medicare formula, SSI status depends on eligibility for a cash payment during the hospitalization month, not just basic program eligibility.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided 7-2 · April 29, 2025 · Opinion by Justice Barrett
- What it’s about
- This case concerns the calculation of Medicare reimbursement rates for hospitals that serve a disproportionate share of low-income patients.
- Who it affects
- Hospitals' Medicare reimbursement calculations must use this month-by-month SSI cash-payment standard.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
The Supreme Court held that for the purpose of this calculation, a patient is considered "entitled to benefits" under Supplemental Security Income (SSI) only if they are actually eligible to receive a cash payment during the month of their hospitalization.
The case concerns Medicare payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of low-income patients.
Question presented
Does the phrase “entitled… to benefits” include all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received?
What the Court decided
The vote
From the opinions
“An individual is “entitled to [SSI] benefits” when she is eligible to receive an SSI cash payment during the month of her hospitalization.”
What's next
Lower courts and the Department of Health and Human Services must apply the Court's month-specific cash-payment standard. Hospitals and Medicare administrators will use that rule in reimbursement calculations.
Why it matters
For example, a hospital cannot count a patient in the SSI part of the calculation for a hospitalization month when that patient cannot receive an SSI cash payment.
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary
Show 7 moreShow fewer
Judgment Issued.
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Barrett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined.
Opinion added: Opinion
Opinion added: opinion
Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Advocate Christ Medical v. Becerra, Sec. of H&HS
Argued. For petitioners: Melissa Arbus Sherry, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Ephraim McDowell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
Brief added: Petition
More questions
- What did the Supreme Court rule in Advocate Christ Medical Center?
- The Court said a patient counts as entitled to SSI benefits only if eligible for an SSI cash payment during the hospitalization month.
- How does this decision affect hospital Medicare payments?
- Hospitals must use the cash-payment standard when calculating a Medicare reimbursement rate tied to low-income patients. The calculation may change for patients without a payable SSI benefit that month.
- What happens next after Advocate Christ Medical Center?
- Lower courts and federal health officials must follow the Court's rule. Hospitals will apply it when Medicare reimbursement calculations are made.
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.