Skip to main content
Illustration for McCrory v. Alabama
Docket 23-6232

McCrory v. Alabama

This case involves a challenge to a conviction based on discredited bite mark evidence, where forensic experts testified at an evidentiary hearing that the injury in question was not actually a human bite mark. The petitioner sought Supreme Court review after the lower courts upheld the conviction despite this new scientific consensus.

Status
Decided
Appeal from
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decision released
Jul 2, 2024

Decision briefing

The case in plain English

Start with the holding, why it matters, and the strongest takeaways from the opinions.

Structured case briefing unavailable

The generated briefing for this case is missing or invalid, so this page is not rendering a partial substitute. Use the timeline, sourcing note, and primary materials below instead.

Where things stand

Timeline

Key court milestones at a glance.

Case Accepted
Arguments HeardUpcoming
Decision ReleasedJul 2, 2024

Source note

How this page is sourced

Official case materials anchor this page. Reporting is used only to add context and explain the dispute in plain English.

Page data last refreshed Mar 9, 2026.

Primary materials

Documents & resources

Briefs, opinions, transcripts, and audio when they are available.

Recent coverage

In the news

Selected reporting and analysis that can help you follow the public conversation around the case.

More to watch

Related cases on the docket

Other live cases with a similar posture, so readers can move across the docket without losing the thread.