No. 23-1127October Term 2024Decided Feb 21, 2025
Wisconsin Bell, Inc., Petitioner v. United States, ex rel. Todd Heath
The Supreme Court ruled that reimbursement requests submitted to the FCC's E-Rate program are subject to the False Claims Act because the federal government provides at least a portion of the program's funding.
Case status
- Current stage
- Decided
- Latest event
- Decision released Feb 21, 2025
- What it's about
The Supreme Court ruled that reimbursement requests submitted to the FCC's E-Rate program are subject to the False Claims Act because the federal government provides at least a portion of the program's funding. The unanimous decision affirmed that the government's role in collecting and distributing funds, even if they originate from private carriers, satisfies the statutory requirement that the government "provide" the money.
Question presented
Do reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program qualify as “claims” under the False Claims Act?
- Case path
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / Decision released Feb 21, 2025
- Area
Decided Supreme Court case
Related cases




Grounding
- Grounding
- Primary-source trail available.
- Note
- Plain-English explainer. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.
- Checked
- Mar 30, 2026
- Method
- Methodology
Primary materials8
Supreme Court docket 23-1127
docket | Mar 30, 2026
Primary case document
Supreme Court document | Mar 30, 2026
CourtListener docket record
docket | Mar 30, 2026
Questions Presented
brief
opinion
opinion | Feb 21, 2025
Opinion
opinion | Feb 21, 2025
Oral Arguments - Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S., ex rel. Heath
audio | Nov 4, 2024
Petition
brief | Apr 15, 2024