Skip to main content

No. 23-1127October Term 2024Decided Feb 21, 2025

Docket 23-1127October Term 2024 (2024–2025)

Wisconsin Bell, Inc., Petitioner v. United States, ex rel. Todd Heath

The Supreme Court ruled that reimbursement requests submitted to the FCC's E-Rate program are subject to the False Claims Act because the federal government provides at least a portion of the program's funding.

Case status

Current stage
Decided
Latest event
Decision released Feb 21, 2025
Case AcceptedJun 17, 2024
Arguments HeardNov 4, 2024
Decision ReleasedFeb 21, 2025
What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that reimbursement requests submitted to the FCC's E-Rate program are subject to the False Claims Act because the federal government provides at least a portion of the program's funding. The unanimous decision affirmed that the government's role in collecting and distributing funds, even if they originate from private carriers, satisfies the statutory requirement that the government "provide" the money.

Question presented

Do reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program qualify as “claims” under the False Claims Act?

Case path

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit / Decision released Feb 21, 2025

Area

Decided Supreme Court case