Skip to main content
Illustration for Food and Drug Administration, Petitioner v. Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C., dba Triton Distribution, et al.
Docket 23-1038

Food and Drug Administration, Petitioner v. Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C., dba Triton Distribution, et al.

The Supreme Court ruled that the FDA did not act arbitrarily or capriciously when it denied applications to market flavored e-cigarette products, finding the agency's requirement for robust scientific evidence was consistent with the Tobacco Control Act. The Court also clarified the harmless-error standard under the Administrative Procedure Act, determining that the FDA's failure to review marketing plans did not prejudice the outcome.

Status
Decided
Appeal from
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Argued
Dec 2, 2024
Decision released
Apr 2, 2025

Decision briefing

The case in plain English

Start with the holding, why it matters, and the strongest takeaways from the opinions.

Structured case briefing unavailable

The generated briefing for this case is missing or invalid, so this page is not rendering a partial substitute. Use the timeline, sourcing note, and primary materials below instead.

Where things stand

Timeline

Key court milestones at a glance.

Case Accepted
Arguments HeardDec 2, 2024
Decision ReleasedApr 2, 2025

Source note

How this page is sourced

This page is grounded in official case materials and tracker data.

Page data last refreshed Mar 9, 2026.

Primary materials

Documents & resources

Briefs, opinions, transcripts, and audio when they are available.

Briefs

Opinions

FDA
opinionBy Samuel Alito
FDA
opinionBy Samuel Alito
opinion
opinion

Recent coverage

In the news

Selected reporting and analysis that can help you follow the public conversation around the case.

More to watch

Related cases on the docket

Other live cases with a similar posture, so readers can move across the docket without losing the thread.