Skip to main content
Docket 19-8098
Docket 19-8098

Rodriguez v. United States

```json {

Status
Before Arguments

Case briefing

What this case is about

Start with the dispute, the stakes, and the next major move on the Court's calendar.

What are the basics?

```json { "summary": "The Court ruled that police officers cannot extend a routine traffic stop to conduct a drug-sniffing dog search without reasonable suspicion of a crime.", "questionPresented": "Whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits police from extending the duration of a traffic stop to conduct a dog sniff without reasonable suspicion." } ```

Where things stand

Timeline

Key court milestones at a glance.

Case AcceptedUpcoming
Arguments HeardUpcoming
Decision ReleasedUpcoming

Source note

How this page is sourced

The short sourcing note for this page, without the extra clutter.

This page is drawing from the tracker record, but linked source material is still thin. Expect the paper trail to fill in as filings and reporting are attached.

Page data last refreshed Mar 8, 2026.

Recent coverage

In the news

Selected reporting and analysis that can help you follow the public conversation around the case.

More to watch

Related cases on the docket

Other live cases with a similar posture, so readers can move across the docket without losing the thread.

Docket 25-365Trump v. BarbaraArgued Apr 1, 2026Docket 25-5Noem v. Al Otro LadoArgued Mar 24, 2026Docket 25-457Johnson v. High Desert State PrisonStatus in motionDocket 25-5557Howell v. Circuit Court of IndianaStatus in motion