Federal review of state rulings
Woods v. Etherton
In brief
The Supreme Court overturned the Sixth Circuit’s judgment in Timothy Etherton’s case.
- Where it stands
- Decided
Decided · April 4, 2016 · Per curiam
- What it’s about
- The case concerned when a federal court may overturn a state court’s denial of habeas relief under AEDPA, a law governing challenges to state convictions. The Supreme Court overturned the Sixth Circuit’s judgment.
- Who it affects
- The Sixth Circuit’s judgment in Timothy Etherton’s case no longer stands.
Summary: written with AI from the case record.
What it's about
AEDPA governs federal court review of state prisoners’ challenges to their convictions.
Question presented
Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit properly apply the standard from the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) that, as long as “fairminded jurists” could disagree about the state court’s conclusion, a federal court should not overrule a state court’s denial of habeas relief?
What the Court decided
Holding
Petition granted and Judgment reversed. Opinion per curiam.
- Result
- Reversed
The vote
- Majority author
- Per Curiam
What's next
The Supreme Court has finished its review; no further step is stated.
Documents
Opinions
Docket activity
New analysis added
AI analysis generated: Case Briefing
AI analysis generated: Decision Record
Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata
Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata
Show 1 moreShow fewer
Opinion added: Woods
Sources
Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.