Skip to main content

State lawsuits over gas markets

Oneok v. Learjet

Updated Oct 26, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court upheld the Ninth Circuit: the Natural Gas Act does not block the retail buyers' state antitrust claims.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 7-2 · April 21, 2015 · Opinion by Justice Breyer

What it’s about
Learjet and other retail gas buyers sued Oneok and other energy traders, alleging practices that inflated natural-gas prices.
Who it affects
The Natural Gas Act does not bar Learjet and the other retail buyers' state antitrust claims.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Oneok, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc.
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court agreed with the Ninth Circuit that the Natural Gas Act did not bar their state antitrust claims (preempt them), even though the claims concerned practices affecting wholesale gas markets.

Learjet and other retail gas buyers alleged that Oneok and other energy traders used practices that inflated natural-gas prices.

The Natural Gas Act covers interstate gas transportation and wholesale sales; these buyers purchased gas at retail and sued under state antitrust laws.

Question presented

Does the Natural Gas Act pre-empt state-law claims challenging industry practices that directly affect the wholesale natural gas market when those claims are asserted by litigants who purchased gas in retail transactions?

What the Court decided

Holding

Respondents’ state-law antitrust claims are not within the field of matters pre-empted by the Natural Gas Act. 715 F. 3d 716, affirmed.

Result
Affirmed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Dissented
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 7joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyerwrote the opinion
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomasalso wrote separately
  4. Kennedy
  5. Ginsburg
  6. Sotomayor
  7. Alito
Dissenting · 2disagreed with the result
  1. Scaliawrote the dissent
  2. Roberts
7 justices joined the judgment, 2 dissented.

From the opinions

“The Natural Gas Act divides responsibility over trade in natural gas between federal and state regulators.”

— Justice Scalia(dissent)

What's next

Whether the buyers can prove their state antitrust claims remains unresolved; the Court decided only that the Natural Gas Act does not block them.

Documents

1

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Oct 26, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 26, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 26, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 26, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 26, 2026 · Generated

Show 4 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 26, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 26, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Oneok

    Apr 21, 2015 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 26, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis