Skip to main content

State tax reporting rules

Direct Marketing Association v. Barbara Brohl

Updated Oct 26, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court decided the Tax Injunction Act does not block the association's suit, but left the legality of Colorado's rules undecided.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · March 3, 2015 · Opinion by Justice Thomas

What it’s about
The Direct Marketing Association challenged Colorado rules requiring some out-of-state retailers that do not collect the state’s use tax to notify customers and report purchases to Colorado.
Who it affects
The Tax Injunction Act does not bar the Direct Marketing Association's federal suit, but the ruling does not decide whether Colorado's rules are lawful.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Direct Marketing Association v. Barbara Brohl, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Revenue
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled that the Tax Injunction Act did not block the federal suit, overturned the appeals court’s ruling, and sent the case back to that court (remanded); it did not decide whether the rules are lawful.

Colorado's rules required certain out-of-state retailers that did not collect the state's use tax to notify customers and report their purchases to the state.

Question presented

Does the Tax Injunction Act bar federal court jurisdiction over a suit brought by non-taxpayers to enjoin the enforcement of notice-and-reporting requirements of state tax law that neither impose nor require the collection of a tax?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petitioner’s suit is not barred by the TIA. 735 F. 3d 904, reversed and remanded.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomaswrote the opinion
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedyalso wrote separately
  6. Ginsburgalso wrote separately
  7. Sotomayor
  8. Roberts
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The case returns to the Tenth Circuit for further proceedings. Whether Colorado's rules are lawful remains unresolved.

Documents

1

Opinions

  • Brohl

    Thomasdelivered, Kennedy

View the full docket on supremecourt.gov

Docket activity

9
  • New analysis added

    Oct 26, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 26, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 26, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Oct 26, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Oct 26, 2026 · Generated

Show 4 more
  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 26, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Oct 26, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Brohl

    Mar 3, 2015 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Oct 26, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis