Skip to main content

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Edgar D. Brown, et ux., Co-Administrators of the Estate of Julian David Brown

Updated Nov 3, 2026

In brief

The Supreme Court overturned the state appeals court and ruled that Goodyear’s foreign affiliates could not be sued in North Carolina over claims unrelated to their activity in the state.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · June 27, 2011 · Opinion by Justice Ginsburg

What it’s about
After two North Carolina teenagers died in a bus crash in France, their families sued Goodyear’s foreign affiliates in North Carolina over allegedly faulty tires made in Turkey.
Who it affects
Goodyear’s foreign affiliates could not face these North Carolina claims because they were unrelated to the affiliates’ activities in the state.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Edgar D. Brown, et ux., Co-Administrators of the Estate of Julian David Brown
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court overturned the state appeals court, ruling that the affiliates could not be sued in North Carolina over claims unrelated to their activities there.

The case followed a bus crash in France that killed two North Carolina teenagers; Julian Brown’s estate administrators brought the suit.

The suit was filed in North Carolina over a fatal crash in France involving tires allegedly made in Turkey.

Question presented

May a consumer sue a foreign manufacturer in a U.S. court when the manufacturer's only connection with the United States is that another company sells its products in this country?

What the Court decided

Holding

Petitioners were not amenable to suit in North Carolina on claims unrelated to any activity of petitioners in the forum State. 199 N. C. App. 50, 681 S. E. 2d 382, reversed.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 9joined the Court's opinion
  1. Breyer
  2. Kagan
  3. Thomas
  4. Scalia
  5. Kennedy
  6. Ginsburgwrote the opinion
  7. Sotomayor
  8. Roberts
  9. Alito
9 justices joined the judgment.

What's next

The North Carolina appeals court’s judgment has been overturned. The Supreme Court’s disposition does not identify any further step in the case.

Documents

2

Docket activity

10
  • New analysis added

    Nov 3, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Nov 3, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Nov 3, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Nov 3, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Nov 3, 2026 · Generated

Show 5 more
  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Nov 3, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: summary, question_presented, generation_metadata

    Nov 3, 2026 · Court records

  • Case data updated: question_presented, extraction_metadata

    Oct 17, 2026 · Court records

  • Audio Recording added: Oral Arguments - Brown

    Oct 30, 2014 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Brown

    Jun 27, 2011 · Court records

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Nov 3, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis