Skip to main content

Owasso Independent School District No. I—011 v. Falvo

Updated Oct 21, 2026

In brief

Peer-graded assignments are not protected FERPA education records before the teacher collects and records the grades.

Where it stands
Decided

Decided 9-0 · February 19, 2002 · Opinion by Justice Kennedy

What it’s about
A parent sued a school district claiming that the practice of having students grade each other's assignments violated the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
Who it affects
Schools may continue peer grading without treating uncollected assignments as official education records. For example, a teacher may have students score a classmate's quiz before the teacher collects and records the grade.

Summary: written with AI from the case record.

Illustration for Owasso Independent School District No. I—011 v. Falvo
Conceptual illustration · AI-generated

What it's about

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that peer grading does not violate FERPA because the assignments are not considered official education records until the teacher collects and records the grades.

The case defined when student work becomes an education record protected by FERPA.

Question presented

Does the practice of peer grading violate the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974?

What the Court decided

Holding

Adjudged to be reversed and remanded J. Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court, in which C.J. Rehnquist, and J. Stevens, J. O'Connor,J. Souter, J. Thomas, J. Ginsburg, and J. Breyer, joined. J. Scalia filed an opinion concurring in thejudgment.

Result
Reversed

The vote

  • Joined the judgment
  • Concurred in a separate opinion
  • Wrote an opinion
Majority · 8joined the Court's opinion
  1. Rehnquist
  2. Stevens
  3. O'Connor
  4. Kennedywrote the opinion
  5. Souter
  6. Thomas
  7. Ginsburg
  8. Breyer
Concurring · 1agreed with the result, wrote separately
  1. Scalia
9 justices joined the judgment (1 writing separately).

What's next

The Court has finished this case. Schools may apply the decision when using peer grading practices.

Documents

1

Opinions

  • Falvo

    Kennedy, Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Scalia

View the full docket on supremecourt.gov

Docket activity

8
  • New analysis added

    Oct 21, 2026 · Court records

  • AI analysis generated: Impact Analysis

    Oct 21, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Opinion Summary

    Oct 21, 2026 · Generated

  • AI analysis generated: Decision Record

    Oct 21, 2026 · Generated

  • New analysis added

    Sep 3, 2026 · Court records

Show 3 more
  • AI analysis generated: Case Briefing

    Sep 3, 2026 · Generated

  • Case data updated: term, status, opinion_date

    Jul 25, 2026 · Court records

  • Opinion added: Falvo

    Feb 19, 2002 · Court records

More questions

3
What did the Supreme Court rule in Owasso v. Falvo?
The Court unanimously decided that peer grading does not violate FERPA. Assignments are not official education records before the teacher collects and records grades.
Who is affected by the Owasso v. Falvo decision?
Schools, teachers, students, and parents are affected. Teachers may use peer grading for assignments before grades are collected and recorded.
What happens next after Owasso v. Falvo?
The case is finished. Schools may continue peer grading consistent with the Court's decision.

Sources

Primary materials plus reporting. Best-effort analysis: this explainer relies on a mix of primary materials and trusted secondary sources. Official filings and opinions remain authoritative.

Checked Sep 3, 2026Methodology

Court records and filings

Reporting and analysis